Thanks to owlboy over on Dreamwidth, I have recently learned of the existence of this podcast/commentary thing where RTD, the Moffinator and David Tennant discuss the season 4 episode "Forest of the Dead" (amongst other things). 

Just under 39 minutes in, RTD reminds Moffat that in the first draft of the script, Donna's love interest/fake husband Lee turned out in the real world to be a "stuttering, stammering overweight girl." The idea would have been that, in the fake world inhabited by Donna, Lee and their fake children, people appear differently than they do in reality. Ultimately, it was felt that it was too big an idea for one scene to get across.

Had the script not been changed, we would have realised that Donna had formed a sort-of relationship with a transgender character. Which as far as I know, is unprecedented in Doctor Who history. In a way, I'm glad it didn't happen because I think it might have been perceived by some viewers as a joke or something, another indication that Moff is "not serious" when it comes to GLBT inclusion. But I think it's worth discussing nonetheless.

P.S. Here's the commentary for "Silence in the Library" too.

P.P.S. Yes, technically I am breaking my own rule in discussing RTD-era Who on this comm, but it was a Moffat-scripted episode, so that's my excuse.

Date: 2012-09-07 09:55 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] rabiya-al-basri.livejournal.com
I can see that going badly pretty easily, particularly given the "stuttering" and "overweight" parts.

AFAIK New Who has one-and-only-one mention of trans stuff, and it's an RTD one...and it's total shit. The villain of episode 2--I forget her name, but the stretched out skin thing--once says something like "when I was a boy" and it's left at that. It's kind of weird in that they bother to make a stereotypical trans villain and don't follow up on it besides the "trans people are unnatural and obsessed with surgery" implication.

Date: 2012-09-07 09:56 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] rabiya-al-basri.livejournal.com
oh and evil, can't forget the trans people are evil killers implication.

Date: 2012-09-07 10:14 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] rabiya-al-basri.livejournal.com
Well, being a girl without a vagina one is judged exclusively on one's appearance 110% of the time, but otherwise agreed.

Date: 2012-09-08 07:40 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] rabiya-al-basri.livejournal.com
I don't think I noticed your new icon before, but I love it.

Date: 2012-09-08 02:56 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] 10littlebullets.livejournal.com
It's kind of weird in that they bother to make a stereotypical trans villain and don't follow up on it besides the "trans people are unnatural and obsessed with surgery" implication.

FWIW, I read it as a Michael Jackson crack. Which is also arguably in poor taste, but I don't think trans people in general are the butt of the joke there.

As for the original post: you know that bit in The Matrix, where post-red-pill Neo finds himself in a computer projection looking like his old self instead of a naked mole rat, and Morpheus handwaves it away as "residual self-image"? I always wondered whether trans people would show up in psychologically-accurate, rather than physically-accurate (well, Matrix-accurate) bodies. Same for people with body-dysmorphic eating disorders--actually that one sounds more likely, unluckily for all concerned.

Date: 2012-09-08 07:11 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] rabiya-al-basri.livejournal.com
The "haha Michael Jackson is a white woman who used to be a black man" *is* a transphobic joke, the same way that "haha ur gay" is homophobic even when aimed at a straight person.

Profile

moffaterawho: (Default)
Moffat Era Who

January 2013

S M T W T F S
  123 4 5
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 30th, 2026 06:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios